Comparison of the foreign policy decision making by the United States Essay

Comparison of the remote policy decision making by the United States and Germany on the deterrent example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF - Essay Example1. Foreign Policy Decision Making of the US 1.1 Constitutional Conditions By virtue of his constitutional prerogatives, as set up in Article II, office 1 and 2 of the US Constitution, the President of the United States is the nations chief executive and air force officer in Chief of the Army and Navy, as well as is granted the power to make treaties with foreign nations, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate give upd two thirds of the Senators concur (Clause 2). This postulate not only outlines the presidential powers in get a line to foreign policy decision making, but also gives the Senate quite a passable share in that process by requiring Senate approval and confirmation of any treaty before it comes into effect. However, the President is allowed to enter into presidential or sole executive agreements concluded on the basis of his constitutional authority in affection to Article II, component 1, atom 2, Clause 1 and Clause 2, as well as Section 3 of the Constitution ( relation backional Research Service, Library of coitus 4). In addition to his control over the phalanx forces, the President has the authority to deploy them at his discretion in other words to wage struggle while the sexual congress is empowered to declare war, and to raise and support armies, as well as to provide and maintain navy, which alongside the control of funding the military provides another way of keeping the executive dissever in check (Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 8, Clauses 11, 12, 13). Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the Congress is additionally empowered to make all Laws which shell be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the preliminary Powers (Clause 18), which clause enables the legislature to use any reasonable means to put the powers in questi on into action, and authorizes the Congress to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers of the other branches as well (Constitution of the US, Article I, Section 8, Explanation). This division of the war powers had repeatedly been put to the test in Korea, Vietnam and other places, where the US were regard in a number of intense conflicts without any declaration of war. That had provoked congressmens concern and a subject argument over the meaning of these powers and the erosion of congressional authority to decide whether and when the United States should be involved in a war. As a consequence, both the House of Representatives and Senate passed the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148) which, although macrocosm vetoed by the President Nixon, was enacted in 1973. The resolution has been intended to guarantee that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities (War Powers Resolution, Sec. 2a), as well as to specialise the procedures of consultation, reporting, congressional action, etc. in regard to the US involvement into such situations. 1.2. Participating Institutions As seen from above, the institutions important in the process of creation (decision making) and implementation of U.S. foreign